In Evans v Barclays Bank Plc and others, the CAT decided that the collective proceedings which Phillip Evans, a former policy adviser at Which?, was seeking to bring as class representative should not be brought on an opt-out basis as it considered the claim ‘so weak that it was liable to be struck out’. The Court of Appeal overturned the decision and remitted Evans’ application to the tribunal. The appellants, Barclays and other leading banks, appealed to the Supreme Court. change1 change2 change3 change4 change5 change6
| less than a minute read
Supreme Court upholds CAT over £2.7bn collective action

text


